National Highways second 'Smart Motorways Stocktake' shows that once again smart motorways are our safest roads. We take a look at the highlights from this latest report and what more needs to be done.
Join other savvy professionals just like you at CIHT. We are committed to fulfilling your professional development needs throughout your career
National Highways (NH) have recently published their second ‘Smart Motorways Stocktake’ – a progress report reviewing the latest safety data and evidence on smart motorways. As with their first year report, this report has once again shown that in terms of serious or fatal casualties, smart motorways are our safest roads. We’ve outlined some of the major headlines to come out of this latest smart motorways stocktake below, including major progress points, the ‘Driving on Motorways Campaign’, their response to the TSC report and key safety data.
As part of this second year stocktake, NH have given updates on the progress they have made based on the Action Plan they set out in 2020. Over the past year NH have:
As part of their work to provide more information to drivers, NH rolled out a ‘Driving on Motorways Campaign’. This campaign focuses on increasing public confidence in the safety of smart motorways and helps to ensure drivers know the steps they need to take if they break down on a smart motorway. Taking a creative approach, the campaign centres on a documentary style film hosted by Suzi Perry and Ortis Deley, which you can watch below and find on their ‘Driving on Motorways’ hub.
The current stocktake report acknowledges the Transport Committee Report that came out late last year, which resulted in the Government pausing the roll out of new ALR smart motorways until five years of safety and economic data is available. NH welcomed the scrutiny given by TSC and are fully committed to acting on all their recommendations, stating:
The pause on new ALR motorways gives us time to continue to listen and act upon customer and stakeholder feedback, together with collecting further safety and economic data.
In September 2021 the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) recommended that NH use Personal Injury Collisions (PIC), Fatal and Weighted Injuries (FWI) and Killed and Serious Injuries (KSI) as the key metrics to assess safety on smart motorways. Based on these metrics NH have reported that:
However:
The biggest issue facing smart motorways appears to be the scepticism of the general public. Despite smart motorways being our safest roads, the topic still remains highly polarising with many people criticising their roll-out. Despite NH’s best efforts to produce engaging safety content, it is still met with resistance, with one twitter user commenting:
The fact that NH have to post instructional videos only goes to show that they know smart motorways are highly dangerous.
This viewpoint is reflective of the difficulties in presenting safety information in the correct way. Clearly, more work needs to be done to address the public’s perception, as CIHT has called for, and this has been acknowledged by the Government and NH.
For more information on what CIHT has done in this area please refer to these articles:
How safe are smart motorways? | CIHT
CIHT gives evidence on Smart Motorways to Transport Select Committee | CIHT
Join other savvy professionals just like you at CIHT. We are committed to fulfilling your professional development needs throughout your career
Sign up to the APM Newsletter.
{{item.AuthorName}} {{item.AuthorName}} says on {{item.DateFormattedString}}: